Ohmigod, how excruciating was that episode? <br>I really didn't mind the episode, it wasn't nearly as good as this show has been in the past. The thing that annoyed me was that it felt like there was a commercial every three minutes. Plus it was a little too Ghost Whisperer for me... spirits roaming the hospital hallways and jumping back into bodies.
savannah
25th February 2007 - 09:51 PM
| QUOTE | Also? Not enough Kyle Chandler. <br>I actually felt bad for Kyle Chandler. I wondered if he and the other actors in that crapass, soap operaish "Meh's limbo" felt repulsed spouting that godawful dialogue under the oh-so-dramatic lighting and directing of those scenes. The show is beyond camp now.
gilbertblythe
10th March 2007 - 07:42 PM
I lost interest in this show this season but I will definitely be tuning in for the Addison spin off. I've never really cared for the Addison character but if Tim Daly is involved I am sure as hell going to watch. An added bonus is Paul Adelstein (Prison Break) will be appearing as well. He was originally hired to play the character of Burke but had to drop out due to scheduling conflicts. Isaiah Washington was not the first choice for the role.
rememberthename
18th March 2007 - 08:12 PM
If Paul Alderstein is in it then I will definetly be watching. (But does that mean he wont be on Prison Break? uh oh) Izzie and George!? Did they actually have sex? I would guess they did since they are naked in bed together but ew. I did see a tiny bit of chemistry between them while they were drunk but still he is married. Whats with Greys Anatomy and adultrous sex? I also didnt like it when Meredith and Derek had prom sex while he was still married. I cant wait to see the fallout of Izzie and George having sex (if they did). They are making Meredith alot more likeable, at least to me. I'm glad she started being nice to her step mom and her hair was really pretty
roseland
18th March 2007 - 10:44 PM
| QUOTE | Whats with Greys Anatomy and adultrous sex? Yeah, Shonda doesn't seem to think marriage vows should get in the way of desperate sex.
savannah
19th March 2007 - 06:08 PM
Shonda also thinks that the workplace should not get in the way of sexual shenanigans. I stopped watching last week's episode after the ass grab. It was so completely unrealistic (even for a show that gave us hospital proms and residents living in basements). Did any character ever address the inappropriateness of the conduct? Probably not, since the whole show is built around the dreams of a plaintiff's lawyer specializing in sexual harassment suits.
NineEightCentral
23rd March 2007 - 06:05 AM
I just...I just don't understand this show. I try to understand why Shonda does things the way she does them and I keep trying to hope that she has some master plan, but it's becoming more and more clear to me that she's a one trick pony.
What inappropriate woman can George have sex with next season? Addison? Bailey? Come on. At least the Meredith thing made some sort of sense, as awful as it was. George/Izzie was just dumb.
copssister
23rd March 2007 - 06:39 AM
Well said, NineEightCentral. Stop by the Greetings and Salutations thread and introduce yourself.
I get Shonda's message that there are aspects to each character that we love/hate as the episodes roll out. However, since the only character I've enjoyed unconditionally since the beginning is Joe, the pub owner, it's not looking good for my long-term interest in the show.
savannah
23rd March 2007 - 10:07 AM
As mentioned earlier, I tuned out of last week's episode after the ridiculous ass grab (as if someone vying for a position of chief of staff would approach a former student and grab her ass in front of a dozen others, including competitors for the job)). I wanted to see LTG's reaction to the inappropriate ass grab, so I read his recap and I loved his conclusion. (And while THe Izzy/George sex is also ridiculous and soapy, at least it comes from a more organic place than that ass grab).
| QUOTE | So, could we just send everybody on this show to Shortbus so they can spend a couple of days having inappropriate sex and then come back and quit it? Because the constant inappropriate sexual and romantic connections and misconnections and the triangles (and every other polygon you can imagine) are ruining this show. I used to love this show because I'd watch these screwed up people muddle through their lives as best they could and at some point in every episode I'd look at a character and think, "That's me. That's my damage, and that's how I can deal with it or choose not to deal with it." But this constant bed-hopping is not me or anyone I know or anyone I want to know. And I don't know if this was Shonda's plan all along (in which case she's not the writer I thought she was) or if she's caught up in trying to please the small but freakishly obsessive group of fans who care about nothing other than shipping this pair or that pair or some other pairing I haven't imagined yet (in which case all I can say is that she will never make them happy and in trying to do so she'll drive away any viewer with half a brain). It's not too late to turn the show around. There are some great writers on staff, and more than a few terrific actors. But this show is not going to get its groove back unless and until Shonda realizes that there are ways to show us character development that don't involve people falling in or out of bed. Okay, rant over. <br>Thank you, LTG. But, you know, perhaps cutting back on the shipper threads that are started at TWOP everytime one character talks to another one would help in the war against shipper-driven storylines.
two shoes
25th March 2007 - 11:02 PM
Futon Critic has a show description (see the right hand sidebar) for the proposed spin off, apparently from an ABC press release. Slightly different than the spoilers from Ausiello and Kristen, but still pretty interesting. The only reason I'm watching GA at all at this point is in anticipation for the spin-off. I love Addison, Joe Hackett and Agent Kellerman.
mtanner
25th March 2007 - 11:58 PM
QUOTE (savannah+Mar 23 2007, 06:07 PM) As mentioned earlier, I tuned out of last week's episode after the ridiculous ass grab (as if someone vying for a position of chief of staff would approach a former student and grab her ass in front of a dozen others, including competitors for the job)). I wanted to see LTG's reaction to the inappropriate ass grab, so I read his recap and I loved his conclusion. (And while THe Izzy/George sex is also ridiculous and soapy, at least it comes from a more organic place than that ass grab).
| QUOTE | So, could we just send everybody on this show to Shortbus so they can spend a couple of days having inappropriate sex and then come back and quit it? Because the constant inappropriate sexual and romantic connections and misconnections and the triangles (and every other polygon you can imagine) are ruining this show. I used to love this show because I'd watch these screwed up people muddle through their lives as best they could and at some point in every episode I'd look at a character and think, "That's me. That's my damage, and that's how I can deal with it or choose not to deal with it." But this constant bed-hopping is not me or anyone I know or anyone I want to know. And I don't know if this was Shonda's plan all along (in which case she's not the writer I thought she was) or if she's caught up in trying to please the small but freakishly obsessive group of fans who care about nothing other than shipping this pair or that pair or some other pairing I haven't imagined yet (in which case all I can say is that she will never make them happy and in trying to do so she'll drive away any viewer with half a brain). It's not too late to turn the show around. There are some great writers on staff, and more than a few terrific actors. But this show is not going to get its groove back unless and until Shonda realizes that there are ways to show us character development that don't involve people falling in or out of bed. Okay, rant over. <br>Thank you, LTG. But, you know, perhaps cutting back on the shipper threads that are started at TWOP everytime one character talks to another one would help in the war against shipper-driven storylines. This is true. I certainly get put off too by the overreaction to couples - very common in that forum. Addison/Alex probably the most because that was everywhere. The reaction to G/I is largely negative so that doesn't bother me as much. It's definitely a problem with the show - this coupling business. I don't really have that much respect for Shonda to turn things around because one listen to her podcasts and you can see what a giggly, drooling fangirl she is (she referred to the reappearance of Dylan and Denny as her 'manwich' - gag).
I do miss the low-key quirk of S1. It's the actors that are the draw for me now.
Oh, I'm quite looking forward to the spin-off too. Especially for Merrin Dungey.
floundering
5th April 2007 - 06:38 AM
Entertainment Weekly has a sidebar article this week called "Taking Sides on Izzie. There are a few sentences for the prosecution and then for the defense, with the ultimate verdict: "The Stevens brand of clumsy, oversize passion is never easy to deal with, but even in her ugliest moments, you gotta admit the girl keeps things interesting--and the exquisite acting of Katherine Heigl just makes adoration that much easier. (That awkward "I believe" speech would have killed lesser women.) Forget the crabby lady with the voiceover: It's Izzie's heart that keeps Anatomy beating."
I hope the knee-knockers choke on it.
WildHoney
3rd May 2007 - 08:21 PM
I haven't liked an episode this much since season two. And I don't remember crying this much at the end of an episode since season one. It was all just so sad. Cristina being excited (in her own weird Cristina way) about trying on wedding dresses, with her mother no less and looks like Burke is having doubts? I was spoiled about Meredith's fake mom maybe dying, but it made it no less sad. Especially watching how it set her so far back with her dad and Derek at the same time. That one scene was so well done...I like that they didn't show the doctors calling time of death. All of the "deaths" happened in that one moment.
And I loved that strong super heroine edit for Addison at the end, even though she'd been the hysterical one the entire episode. And I like how the elevator god turned out because before that, I was thinking the concept was stupid enough to make me not watch an otherwise enjoyable spin-off.
I know this sounds like a run-on gushing fan post, but I'm so excited to have such a solid episode after a pretty subpar season. I just wanted to get it all out before I go to twop and find out how Izzie/KH managed to dominate and ruin the entire thing.
another_iteration
4th May 2007 - 02:52 AM
What a great foundation for a spin-off. I'll tune in. Others in my family were annoyed that I called fakemom's death - and I was pretty spoiler free. I'm still in shock that Thatcher slapped Meredith.
Who knows where the hell this show goes from here - and I mean that in a good way I think. Izzie/George/Callie, Mer/Der, Burke/Cristina hmmmm? Two more episodes and I'll stay away from the spoilers.
NatalieX
4th May 2007 - 09:03 AM
I hated it. I hated being forced to watch the pilot for a spin-off because it was blended with the show I did want to watch. They should have separated Addison's show to the last hour. I think they did that because they know she doesn't have the fan base to sustain it and that most people would have tuned out after the original Grey's.
I won't be tuning in for the spin-off. I like the character of Addison, but the dialogue and situations of that show were excruciatingly contrived. Such a shame considering what a good cast it had.
roseland
4th May 2007 - 09:56 AM
I'm with you, NatalieX. I was so disappointed that they blended the shows. It ruined the flow of the storylines. I'm not sure I would have liked the Addison pilot any better but it didn't help that switching back and forth was just so jarring. I don't think I'll be watching the spin-off, either. It looks like it's being set up to be the same sort of show that Grey's Anatomy is except with different characters in a different state. A couple yearns for each other but won't get together. Sexual shenanigans between co-workers. Judgmental tirades directed at patients. Blech.
copssister
4th May 2007 - 10:04 AM
QUOTE (NatalieX+May 4 2007, 01:03 PM) I won't be tuning in for the spin-off. I like the character of Addison, but the dialogue and situations of that show were excruciatingly contrived. Such a shame considering what a good cast it had. well said, NatalieX. I was also disappointed with the characters' lines. Such a shame for the actors involved. Side note: I never realized Taye Diggs is such a diminutive man.
mtanner
5th May 2007 - 10:00 AM
I really, really disliked it. The GA content isn't really worth talking about because there was so little there, but the Addison stuff - so cheesy. And, yes, GA is inherently quite cheesy but that was pushing it (talking elevator, 'I'm going to kiss you WITH TONGUE!', Piz and the surfboard with drooling grown women! WTF was that?). I also think for this episode they probably should have stuck mostly to the Addison content because it was absurd to jump from George/Izzie into these new people shopping at the store or picking up their car, etc. Just jarring. And boring. So boring.
I'm not really an Addison fan, and Kate Walsh was veering on this side of a ham sandwich for that episode, so I can't say I'll be tuning in. I can't say I really warmed to any of the other characters, either.
dzdzsty
5th May 2007 - 05:10 PM
I wanted to like it, and I certainly prefer seeing Addison be the one who might get the guy, rather than be crapped upon repeatedly, but I did think it was a bit much. Too many characters, with too many quirks.
That said, I kindof hate all the characters on Grey's except for Addison these days, and I'll watch Taye Diggs in just about anything, so I suppose I'll be watching the spinoff no matter what.
The rural juror
12th May 2007 - 08:21 AM
The best part about the spinoff was the cast. It's like a dream team of some of our favorite actors. The worst part was the writing. It's like Ocean 12.
Grey's Anatomy was a show that i really liked. Then the doctors started sleeping with everybody and acting in such unbelievably unprofessional way that the show lost all credibility. It moving rapidly towards Melrose Place levels.
Bailey is probably the only character left that's acting like a real doctor so i fear that the writers will take care of that next.
fofanna1
12th May 2007 - 09:17 AM
I'm going to watch the season finale but I doubt I'll watch next year. The show started as half medical drama, half soap opera and, with the last episode, it tipped over into full soap operadom. The medical parts were just ludicrous and if any of that goes on in real teaching hospitals, we're all in trouble.
fofanna1
7th June 2007 - 07:24 PM
kayla
8th June 2007 - 04:42 AM
Heh - Does seem a wee bit surprising only in the sense that it took them so long...
The rural juror
28th September 2007 - 05:12 PM
So any thoughts from the season premiere? All i could think of was:"Were the dialogs always that bad?".
My problem is that once i watched a show for an entire season, it's very difficult to break it off when it goes down the drain. There's always this irrational hope that it will get better. The only time i actually stopped watching a show that i had been following for years was Crossing Jordan who reached such levels of suck that even i couldn't take it anymore.
Right now, there are only two things that are keeping me watching GA. The first one is my PVR that allows me to fast forward through all the bad parts. The second one is my crush on Chyler Leigh. Heck, i watched that piece of dreck Reunion just because she was in it.
NatalieX
22nd May 2008 - 07:14 PM
Just when I think Bailey couldn't be any more cool, she busts out some in-depth knowledge of the Skywalker-Solo family tree. Awesome.
And I'm sure the Derek and Meredith closing scene was very moving, but I was distracted by the truly horrible cheap special effects.
bsfc
22nd May 2008 - 10:35 PM
Izzie/Alex!
I was done with the show after S2 and the Denny debacle but hung in there for the first few episodes of S3 until they kissed and Izzie turned him down. Again. I stopped watching and missed the 47th round of MerDer, the end of Addison, Mare Winningham and thankfully, George/Izzie.
Caught word through the recaps that they'd begun to revisit Alex/Izzie right before the strike and started watching again. They were awesome tonight! Loved getting more of Alex's background, loved Izzie acting like a grown-up and I loved all their interaction tonight playing out in parallel to the last few episodes of S2 but with a much better conclusion. Broken Alex near broke my heart at the end.
Everything else was pretty entertaining too. All the kids got to me- brain tumor couple with cement boy and FNL's Noelle were a nice contrast and well acted by all.
I'm sure it'll all be fucked up again next season but...awesome finale.
pokey55
23rd May 2008 - 04:51 AM
I have to agree; I don't know exactly how or why it happened but I feel like this show started to get back on track with these last few episodes. Of course, given the track record even as I was watching and enjoying I was thinking about how this could all be fucked up next year. I'm just not ready to trust Shonda won't find a way to have everyone regress again.
I was especially glad to find out what Alex's whole deal is. It broke my heart to hear him say that when he was taking care of his mom he was just a kid but now that he's a man, he'd be better at it. I just thought that whole story (and the parts at the end with Izzie) were just fabulously written and acted.
roseland
23rd May 2008 - 09:22 AM
| QUOTE | And I'm sure the Derek and Meredith closing scene was very moving, but I was distracted by the truly horrible cheap special effects. I was distracted by how bad Ellen Pompeo's acting was.
superior olive
24th May 2008 - 10:44 AM
QUOTE (roseland+May 23 2008, 11:22 AM) | QUOTE | And I'm sure the Derek and Meredith closing scene was very moving, but I was distracted by the truly horrible cheap special effects. I was distracted by how bad Ellen Pompeo's acting was. Yeesh, no kidding. I wasn't that thrilled with her revelation when she (again! manners, Meredith) barged into her shrinks office. That was just a touch off for me, a little too flat, but not by much. I think Ellen Pompeo does much better when she has someone to play off of, rather than the melodramatic scenes all by her lonesome. She seems awkward with it.
Oh, and there were special effects in the last scene? What were they? (shows how I was paying attention!)
The rural juror
7th November 2008 - 10:29 PM
I feel bad for Kevin McKidd. He's a good actor stuck in a mediocre show. I miss Rome. **Sigh**
roseland
10th November 2008 - 11:04 AM
None of these characters are even likable anymore. I hate the way they play the fact that Izzie, Christina, Alec and Meredith never teach their interns even the most basic skills as comedy. It drives me crazy. Unless they finally have an episode where this lack of teaching has dire consequences, I'm pretty sure this will be my last season of this show. It was never close to reality but now it's to the point where I can't even enjoy it, it's so ridiculous. The only reason I'm giving it to the end of the season is because I like the new guy and his relationship with Christina.
The rural juror
10th November 2008 - 11:51 AM
I could see a spinoff with a law firm that handles all the malpractice suits against Seattle Grace. Synergy!
The rural juror
5th December 2008 - 09:12 AM
Just when you think that a show couln't get any more ridiculous, they add sex with a ghost. I guess it was a logical progression since the characters already had sex with everybody so they proceeded to do it with the dead.
The Sloan/Lexie pairing doesn't bug me because of the age difference but rather because that scene was so badly written. Seeing Lexie stripping off her clothes while constantly repeating "teach me" was just wrong on so many levels.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.
dizayn.de © 2003 - 2009 - "lo-fi" for InvisionPower Board v1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|