Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Big Brother Is Watching YOU
Bitter But Brilliant > WHAT'S THE BUZZ? > As The WORLD Turns

Pages: 1, 2
potmeetskettle
It's just a discussion, Big Brother. Please don't start spying on our peeps just because we're tossing about a few ideas here, okay?

ph34r.gif

potmeetskettle
QUOTE (EarthMomma+)
Yes, I'm anti-RFID chip implants (before it's even in style to do so).  I even make the clueless Old Navy clerks cut their RFIDs out of my just purchased clothing (embarassing anyone with me).

And sometimes, when I dwell on HAARP too much (especially after working on a smaller antenna field on Guam), I do think about wearing a tin foil hat.  Just kidding.

<br>
QUOTE (EssPee+)
HAARP? I know what HAART is (highly active anti-retroviral therapy, otherwise known as HIV/AIDS treatment), but I've never heard of HAARP.

<br>
QUOTE (EarthMomma+)
potmeetskettle
QUOTE (derryfree+)
Earthmomma, do you really make them cut out the RFID tags? That is awesome. But do you always know where they are? They're pretty small and undetectable, aren't they? I learned about HAARP on Coast to Coast. In fact that's where I learned about RFID chips. Do you listen? I completely agree that they will be required for newborns in a very short time, and eventually for the rest of us. As for universal healthcare, I think it's the only way the poor will ever be covered. It's appalling that people lose their homes over medical bills. I understand there's a difference between universal and single payer systems. I need to do more research. Something needs to be done.

<br>
QUOTE (EarthMomma+)
QUOTE
Earthmomma, do you really make them cut out the RFID tags?
Yes.
QUOTE (->
QUOTE
Earthmomma, do you really make them cut out the RFID tags?
Yes.
But do you always know where they are?
Most are about the size of a larger postage stamp, usually sewn in the side seam. They feel like a thick label or washing instructions tag. When I first discovered the tag, I emailed Old Navy and they replied telling me that it was a passive RFID used for inventory purposes only. But when you take the tag apart, you can tell it's an active one by checking out the power supply. While I don't think that Old Navy is behind some global conspiracy, I don't appreciate being lied to. I was an electronics tech in the Navy for five years. I know the difference between active and passive RFIDs. (God, I must sound like a real nutcase).
QUOTE
I learned about HAARP on Coast to Coast. In fact that's where I learned about RFID chips. Do you listen?
Yes, I listen every morning on my computer at work. Though, I do skip the Art Bell episodes because I don't like him much anymore (his 9/11 views, marrying a womanchild 1/3 his age two months after his wife's death, etc.).
QUOTE (->
QUOTE
I learned about HAARP on Coast to Coast. In fact that's where I learned about RFID chips. Do you listen?
Yes, I listen every morning on my computer at work. Though, I do skip the Art Bell episodes because I don't like him much anymore (his 9/11 views, marrying a womanchild 1/3 his age two months after his wife's death, etc.).
completely agree that they will be required for newborns in a very short time, and eventually for the rest of us.
My husband and I have thrown around the idea of buying some VeriChip/Applied Digital stock now because the announcements are just around the corner.
<br>.
potmeetskettle
QUOTE (EssPee+)
QUOTE (derryfree+)
In fact that's where I learned about RFID chips. Do you listen? I completely agree that they will be required for newborns in a very short time, and eventually for the rest of us.

I'd actually like to know more about this. I see from Wikipedia that the FDA has approved human-implantable tags, and there's an ambiguous reference to "some hospitals" using them in patients -- about which I can only say, huh? I'm very curious to know where this is happening and whether the notion of tagging newborns -- temporarily or permanently? -- is supposed to be coming from. The idea sounds pretty incredible to me, frankly, although I'll suspend judgment until I know more.

On HAARP, that's interesting; I hadn't heard of the project before. I can't quite figure out what ONR's interest in the subject is, though.

<br>
QUOTE (EarthMomma+)
EssPee - VeriChip boasts a total of 392 medical facilties enrolled in the VeriMed (RFID implant - not to be confused with their infant RFID bracelet) program.  Yikes.

<br>
QUOTE (EssPee+)
Or, on RFID, there's this, which is at least a neutral POV source, whatever else Wikipedia's weaknesses.

I don't yet have independent information on the 392 hospital facilities that VeriChip claims are "enrolled" in the VeriMed program, but I'd note that, first, "enrolled" is an oddly slippery term, and second, that the company has been caught before inflating its figures*. None of which speaks directly to the point, except to say that it often doesn't pay to believe everything a profit-making company says.

--
*See the correction, which reads:
QUOTE
Correction, Dec. 9, 2004: This piece originally stated that 160 members of the Mexican attorney general's staff were implanted with RFID chips. While Applied Digital Solutions, the company that makes the chips, has circulated the 160 figure, a spokesperson for the Mexican attorney general's office now says that only 18 staffers received chip implants. (Return to the corrected sentence.)

[Applied Digital Solutions is the majority owner of VeriChip. --SP]

<br>.
pinruT
I see RFID and HAARP (just learned about that one this morning, so my knowledge base is pretty flimsy) as the next generation of science that allows us to live in the society we currently live in with the ability to chat online with people all over the globe, watch 1000's of channels of TV, carry an Ipod with 1000's of pieces of music, allows 911 to locate me immeidately if I have a heart attack, and allowed my daughter to call us at 2:30 this morning from halfway around the globe to tell us she found a great bargain on a dress. Yes, she's blonde.

I really think unless I want to live in a Montana cabin and wrestle bears for my food supply, I'm pretty much stuck in this century and I'll take the good with the bad. As it is today, I'm trackable 24/7 since I carry a cell phone, and if I lived in a toll-road city, I'd sure as hell have a speed pass in my car to allow me to skip the lines at the toll booth.

I do agree that manditory RFID implanted in people crosses a boundary of personal freedom and I'd hope most congressmen would agree with that.
Msquared
I sway towards pinruT's attitude, for the same reason. I don't want to be a hermit. And bears are godless killing machines and I will not wrestle them either.
I finally accepted that anyone can track me during an interview with the Social Security Administration for my disability claim. They knew everything about me. It was all in their database.

But I too draw the line at tracking devices in my clothes. It's just creepy. Why did I not know about this? Do most retailers do it?
mambru
Yeah,my cat is chipped. And while I might be uneasy about it now I probably will be glad to get a chip with all my medical info on it when I am old and frail so in case I collapse in the street the paramedics will know what to do with me. Of course it's subject to abuse but so are a lot of other things. I think the anti-government streak is sufficiently healthy in our country to prevent mandatory chipping (after all, it's prevented a national ID card, which many non-totalitarian nations consider a matter of course).
I know there's a chip in the label of most clothes I buy (there's usually a helpful dotted line and a message telling me to cut that label off after purchase). I do, of course, but it doesn't bother me that much.
pinruT
I'm always afraid if I cut the labels off the mattress police will show up.
TeslaNewton
QUOTE (pinruT+Mar 9 2007, 10:51 AM)
I'm always afraid if I cut the labels off the mattress police will show up.
But doesn't the tag say only the consumer and remove it? So if you buy it, can't you cut it?
pinruT
QUOTE (TeslaNewton+Mar 9 2007, 10:08 AM)
QUOTE (pinruT+Mar 9 2007, 10:51 AM)
I'm always afraid if I cut the labels off the mattress police will show up.

But doesn't the tag say only the consumer and remove it? So if you buy it, can't you cut it?
Maybe, but I'm always afraid to take that chance.

(mattress police was a joke)
TeslaNewton
QUOTE (pinruT+Mar 9 2007, 11:15 AM)
QUOTE (TeslaNewton+Mar 9 2007, 10:08 AM)
QUOTE (pinruT+Mar 9 2007, 10:51 AM)
I'm always afraid if I cut the labels off the mattress police will show up.

But doesn't the tag say only the consumer and remove it? So if you buy it, can't you cut it?

Maybe, but I'm always afraid to take that chance.

(mattress police was a joke)
Oh, I know. smile.gif I was trying to be funny (plus, I really wasn't sure about the tag).
pinruT
BTW, TeslaNewton, I saw our old buddy Nikola Tesla referenced at the end of the HAARP article.
copssister
Unusual Contrails over Cleveland

Yesterday afternoon, there was a flurry of activity in the sky over the Greater Cleveland area. I witnessed these planes/jets/aircraft moving about the sky, and many of them were not regular airliners. A good majority of the contrails were from multiple aircraft that moved across the sky at speeds over four times that of normal airliners which were also visible in the sky. There were also sharp turns, ascents, and descents that you don't see from regular airliners.

Local media has shrugged the story off as normal weather phenomenon, probably because a local talk-radio personality fueling wacko conspiracy theorists. If it was just squads from Wright-Patterson or Selfridge conducting practice manuevers - why would officials not just say that?

Fofanna - what was your vantage point from the west side of town?
Dane
Wow, this has the potential to be the most fascinating thread yet!

mambru, you say the national ID card was prevented -- sadly, I'm not as up on that as I should be, and it's not for lack of interest. Was it really defeated? Last I heard, the effort was still gearing up.
buffyvol
If Copsss would quit sunbathing topless on the roof of her house, you wouldn't have that sort of thing!
EssPee
The national ID isn't really dead -- it's kind of climbing in through the back door via state driver's licenses. An avowedly opinionated take on the subject is here. I like EPIC -- they usually seem to have a pretty level-headed take on things and steer clear of a lot of conspiracy-type theorizing while doing their best to peer around corners that most of us haven't thought about yet.

I totally get opinions like pinruT's, and I don't think they're wrong. But I'm also a firm believer in the old quote -- I thought it was Jefferson or Franklin, but this site (provenance unknown, no endorsement implied) suggests it was actually the little-remembered Wendell Phillips -- that "eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." It doesn't make me a wingnut, I don't think, to question exactly how new technological innovations are being deployed and whether the way they're being used is really in the best interests of individuals. But I also try to keep a sense of perspective about things, which is one reason I like to mix it up with conspiracy theorists from time to time.

If they're properly implemented, I don't think we have much to fear from RFID tags. The real question, though, is whether the folks who are busy sewing them into our clothing and pasting them into our passports and -- if reports are to be believed -- implanting them into hospital patients and nightclub patrons, are actually thinking through the security angles and doing their best to ensure that the system can't be compromised, that personally identifiable information is firewalled and dumped regularly instead of being stored forever, etc. The original passport standard, for instance, had chips capable of being interrogated at any time, albeit from a relatively close distance. So that would have made it possible for a cheap scanner to identify you and pinpoint your location, just because you happened to walk by with your passport in your pocket. (The latest standard has the chip shielded when the passport is closed, I believe; it sounds good, but I haven't read anything about whether it actually works as advertised.)

One of the best thinkers on these subjects I've ever come across is Bruce Schneier, a cryptographer and security expert who also blogs regularly here. If you've got any interest at all in these subjects, Schneier's blog or the EPIC site are excellent places to start.

Thanks to PMK for breaking this off as a separate subject, and I promise to stop gasbagging shortly. Meanwhile, though, is there any chance we could get another "c" into the "conspiracy" in the thread subtitle? Unless that's just to throw off Big Brother, in which case I'm all in favor ov mispelings.
potmeetskettle
I almost choked on my Jelly Belly. BWAH. Conspirary.
kingdead
How exactly do they get into the nightclub patrons? I assume this is voluntary, because no matter how hard you pregame, I think you'd notice a chip being slipped under your skin at the door.
EssPee
Sadly, I have to credit EarthMomma with making me look this up, but supposedly a Barcelona nightclub offers regular patrons the ability to pay for their drinks with an implanted RFID chip. I guess I don't see the point, given that I always thought the point of a nightclub was to make other people pay for your drinks, but the world is full of odd sorts.
neverenoughjam
QUOTE
I always thought the point of a nightclub was to make other people pay for your drinks,
<br>Damn. I knew I had that backwards.
mambru
QUOTE
mambru, you say the national ID card was prevented -- sadly, I'm not as up on that as I should be, and it's not for lack of interest. Was it really defeated? Last I heard, the effort was still gearing up.
<br>I'm not up on anything much either; as far as I know there was no definitive defeat of the ID card, but I have heard that resistance has been stiff and I don't really see it happening with the change in the Senate... but again, I'm not exactly the best-informed.
Kitty Foyle
QUOTE (copssister+Mar 9 2007, 10:33 AM)
Unusual Contrails over Cleveland

Yesterday afternoon, there was a flurry of activity in the sky over the Greater Cleveland area.  I witnessed these planes/jets/aircraft moving about the sky, and many of them were not regular airliners.  A good majority of the contrails were from multiple aircraft that moved across the sky at speeds over four times that of normal airliners which were also visible in the sky.  There were also sharp turns, ascents, and descents that you don't see from regular airliners.

Local media has shrugged the story off as normal weather phenomenon, probably because a local talk-radio personality fueling wacko conspiracy theorists.  If it was just squads from Wright-Patterson or Selfridge conducting practice manuevers - why would officials not just say that?

Fofanna - what was your vantage point from the west side of town?

Verrry interesting. Here's an interesting one from Chicago a few months ago. There's always an official explanation. I'm just sayin'.

My cat and dog are chipped too, because we, their overlords, like to keep track of them. I don't want to be subjegated to anyone. I would resist an implant to the death. The religious right are the best hope in defeating such a requirement. Too much like the mark of the beast.

Thanks for the thread, PMK.
Dane
QUOTE (derryfree+Mar 9 2007, 10:56 PM)
The religious right are the best hope in defeating such a requirement.  Too much like the mark of the beast. 

Yeah, I was thinking that too.
QUOTE
Revelations, 13:16,17
And [the Antichrist] causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

And that no man might buy or sell, save [except] he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
Msquared
Hallehujah!
EarthMomma
QUOTE (potmeetskettle+Mar 9 2007, 03:35 PM)
I almost choked on my Jelly Belly. BWAH. Conspirary.
Let's get you on Coast to Coast AM! Tonight even.
DodgerGirl
Is Art Bell still doing Coast to Coast? Last I heard he left his trailer in Pahrump and moved to the Philipines to be with his comely new wife.
Flahdagal
There are times when the freaky religious right has it... well... right.
EarthMomma
QUOTE (DodgerGirl+Mar 10 2007, 04:13 PM)
Is Art Bell still doing Coast to Coast? Last I heard he left his trailer in Pahrump and moved to the Philipines to be with his comely new wife.
He does the weekend shows. I think he's back from PI and living in Nevada again. His childbride is pregnant, so they're going to have the baby here.
Kitty Foyle
This seems like perfect Big Brother material.
Msquared
Somehow I find it hard to believe that Gonzalez didn't know what was happening.
"I'm shocked, shocked to find that there's wiretapping going on here." "Your report, sir."
DodgerGirl
QUOTE (EarthMomma+Mar 10 2007, 10:15 PM)
He does the weekend shows. I think he's back from PI and living in Nevada again. His childbride is pregnant, so they're going to have the baby here.
Hah. Somehow I'm not surprised. Thanks Earthmomma.
Kitty Foyle
I'm not surprised either (about Art Bell) - he's kind of strange, isn't he? He met his childbride over the internet and married her very quickly after his previous wife's untimely death. I can't stand to listen to him. It always sounds to me like he's smoking and I imagine he watches himself in the mirror as he talks.
EarthMomma
QUOTE (derryfree+Mar 11 2007, 11:50 AM)
I'm not surprised either (about Art Bell) - he's kind of strange, isn't he? He met his childbride over the internet and married her very quickly after his previous wife's untimely death. I can't stand to listen to him. It always sounds to me like he's smoking and I imagine he watches himself in the mirror as he talks.
I'm not a fan anymore. He constantly "retires", only to come back a few months later, upsetting the flow of C2CAM. Plus, Art always wants the same ol' (crazy) guests on and he refuses to even discuss the 9/11 truth movement. He needs to retire for good.

And he smokes around his pregnant childbride. Nasty. Like two packs a day.

People grieve differently, so I can give him a getoutofjailfree card when it comes to the childbride. If I was 60+ and had $$$$, I think I'd want a mindless young thing too to bang. That said, I tune into the show to hear about Illumnati and Greys, not a two-hour discussion on how Aeryn/Irene (he renamed her!) ate a baked potato for the first time at an Outback Steakhouse. What does that have to do David Icke's Reptilians?
EarthMomma
QUOTE (Msquared+Mar 11 2007, 08:55 AM)
Somehow I find it hard to believe that Gonzalez didn't know what was happening.
"I'm shocked, shocked to find that there's wiretapping going on here." "Your report, sir."
Ha! I find his "shock" completely laughable.
kingdead
What happened with Bell and the 9/11 guys? Was that the line that Bell just couldn't cross?
EarthMomma
QUOTE (kingdead+Mar 11 2007, 07:40 PM)
What happened with Bell and the 9/11 guys? Was that the line that Bell just couldn't cross?
Art said that he “couldn’t believe elected officials would choose to kill thousands of its own citizens.” Ha!


He won't even discuss WTC#7.
kingdead
Really? Are you claiming that the government actively planned the attacks? Or that it failed to stop the attacks? And for what purpose?
EarthMomma
Personally, I don't know what to believe. The US has a rich history of false flag attacks. (I'm sure that in 25 years, the USS Cole attack will be regarded just as the USS Liberty attack is.)

I was in the US Navy during 9/11, working to support the State Department's antenna arrays on Guam. For about two years prior to the months before 9/11, most of the tenant commands were scheduled for closure by Base Realignment and Closure. My command, "Radio Barrigada" was dead, dead, dead. There were about a dozen of us left at our super secluded site. All the housing was emptied, our buildings were closed and we worked out of the State Dept's small concrete building. We were very chummy with the Spooks, oftening sitting outside shooting the shit for hours. The jungle started to take over the base. Life was sweet. For a while, it was a McHale's Navy/Gilligan's Island type of situation for us because they weren't going to release us to another command on island (p.s. This duty station hurt all our careers because we weren't working in our rate). Then right before 9/11, the State Dept. had actual work for us to do! It was buzz, buzz, buzz. Our mission was those damn antennas. Non-stop work. We went from just coming in to muster then being able to go home, to 18 hour work days. The State Dept. no longer allowed us to go inside their buildings either, moving our offices out, even though we all were TSCI and our friends couldn't chitchat with us anymore. You could feel the electricity in the air. You just knew something was about to happen. They made us start standing 24-hour watches in Sept. They brought brand new trailers for us to live in and MUSE units for us to man. It was starting to become very stressfull. We thought it had something to do with the Chinese/EP-3 incident that had just happened. There was also a rumor of a North Korean missle that was launched over the island. The Navy suspended all tourist skydiving jumps in the area (we used to pick up the strays in the jungle - it was a timepasser for us). Anyways, it was a high-stress environment for us, especially with the 24 hour watches. The week before 9/11 we weren't allowed to leave Radio Barrigada at all. Then *boom* 9/11 happened, and everything went back to normal. It was very weird.

Thinking back to that experience, they had to know what was up, right? It's all so shady. Either the Gov. had a hand in it all along, or they allowed it to happen. Who knows?
Dane
QUOTE (EarthMomma+Mar 11 2007, 11:01 PM)
Either the Gov. had a hand in it all along, or they allowed it to happen.
Granted, I've never been a member of the armed forces, but this seems like a huge leap of logic.
EarthMomma
QUOTE (Dane+Mar 11 2007, 10:12 PM)
QUOTE (EarthMomma+Mar 11 2007, 11:01 PM)
Either the Gov. had a hand in it all along, or they allowed it to happen.

Granted, I've never been a member of the armed forces, but this seems like a huge leap of logic.
Oh really?

Yeah, I know it's Wiki, but you can get a summary of the situation and then do further research if you'd like.
Dane
QUOTE (EarthMomma+Mar 11 2007, 11:23 PM)
QUOTE (Dane+Mar 11 2007, 10:12 PM)
QUOTE (EarthMomma+Mar 11 2007, 11:01 PM)
Either the Gov. had a hand in it all along, or they allowed it to happen.

Granted, I've never been a member of the armed forces, but this seems like a huge leap of logic.

<a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident' target='_blank'>Oh really?

<br>The link you posted doesn't, to my mind, have anything to do with 9/11 being our government's doing.
EarthMomma
No, but it demonstrates the US's history of falseflag Northwoods-like shit.
mambru
Doesn't seem quite open and shut to me.
Flahdagal
I don't think they had a hand in it, but I can believe they knew something was going to happen. Something. Somewhere.
mambru
I have no trouble believing that the intelligence community had some inkling that something was going to happen somewhere, soon - but dropped the ball on where, when and how. I always find it easier to believe in huge ignorant fuck-ups than in giant, smoothly functioning, totally successful conpiracies - and the CIA or whomever somehow pulling the strings of a gang of Saudi malcontents with the collaboration of Osama to make them do what they did and NOT screwing it up is just too incredible for words, to me.
Kitty Foyle
I have trouble believing conspiracy theories too. Like the one about 19 hijackers armed with boxcutters managing to commandeer planes and bring down 2 steel buildings and damage the very symbol of our country's defense. No defensive maneuvers by our military? Who would have believed that prior to 9/11? No steel buildings have EVER collapsed due to fire, much less into their own footprint prior to 9/11/01...or since. The first-hand reports included many references to explosions. Those reports quickly disappeared. Rudy G. said the towers were going to collapse before they did. Building 7, which housed oodles of information damaging to Enron, evidence against criminals etc., collapsed for no apparent reason. I have many problems with the conspiracy story we've been given to explain that day. Yet, I would not say that "our government" conspired to kill thousands of Americans that day. I believe most members of our government and an even larger percentage of our military would be horrified by such acts. I can however, believe that a small, but powerful cabal had no such compunctions. Follow the money.
Flahdagal
QUOTE (derryfree+Mar 12 2007, 10:50 AM)
Follow the money.
In-fucking-deed.
kingdead
But Osama and Bush are BFF!

Looking back on it 5 years later, if there really was a conspiracy, those were some super-dumb conspirators. Way to work in your own best interests, Saudi Royal Family/Elders of Zion/Halliburton*!

My favorite conspiracy theory is that Dick Cheney died and was replaced by an Iranian spy, who has been secretly controlling America's foreign policy towards the interests of a new Persian empire. IT'S TRUE!

* OK, way to go Halliburton, for real. The other 2 groups are popular conspiracy targets but I don't know exactly what they got out of their super-secret actions (if they even committed them).
mambru
QUOTE
Like the one about 19 hijackers armed with boxcutters managing to commandeer planes and bring down 2 steel buildings and damage the very symbol of our country's defense.
<br>Well, but the part about the hijackers with boxcutters really did happen...unless you want to bring the pilots and the passengers with their cell-phone accounts into the conspiracy too. And the fact that they COULD take over the planes with such simple tactics shows how easily a flaw in a complex, shoddy security system can be exploited with a little originality.

I regard that 9/11 attack the same way...they took advantage of careless gaps in a system and scored a coup. The Twin Towers were not solid steel buildings but a cage framework of steel and glass. The planes were also metal, and full of fuel. They were like Molotov cocktail, except made of metal and going several hundred miles an hour. I seem to recall the designers of the Twin Towers admitting that their design was not made to withstand such an attack - another careless flaw exploited by an original form of attack - though to be fair, what architect ever imagined he'd have to design for such a thing?

The Empire State building was made of steel and masonry, not steel and glass. It was also struck by a plane in the 40s. A much smaller plane, whose pilot was not actively trying to accelerate into the building. It made a hole from one side of the building to the other, caused a fire, considerable loss of life, and the survivors testified they felt the building shift on its axis.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
Like the one about 19 hijackers armed with boxcutters managing to commandeer planes and bring down 2 steel buildings and damage the very symbol of our country's defense.
<br>Well, but the part about the hijackers with boxcutters really did happen...unless you want to bring the pilots and the passengers with their cell-phone accounts into the conspiracy too. And the fact that they COULD take over the planes with such simple tactics shows how easily a flaw in a complex, shoddy security system can be exploited with a little originality.

I regard that 9/11 attack the same way...they took advantage of careless gaps in a system and scored a coup. The Twin Towers were not solid steel buildings but a cage framework of steel and glass. The planes were also metal, and full of fuel. They were like Molotov cocktail, except made of metal and going several hundred miles an hour. I seem to recall the designers of the Twin Towers admitting that their design was not made to withstand such an attack - another careless flaw exploited by an original form of attack - though to be fair, what architect ever imagined he'd have to design for such a thing?

The Empire State building was made of steel and masonry, not steel and glass. It was also struck by a plane in the 40s. A much smaller plane, whose pilot was not actively trying to accelerate into the building. It made a hole from one side of the building to the other, caused a fire, considerable loss of life, and the survivors testified they felt the building shift on its axis.

Rudy G. said the towers were going to collapse before they did.
<br>So now Rudy's in on it too? Now, I totally dislike Giuliani as a mean-spirited toad of a man (as a New Yorker who actually lived there when America's Mayor was New York's pain in the ass). But I have some trouble believing he'd meekly go along with this simply in order to get some good photo ops for his presidential campaign - or that the conspirators would want to enlist him (and I suppose, all the forces he controlled, or else what would be the point) if he did. The more people in on it, the more chance of exposure. And if he were in on it, wouldn't it be the epitome of stupidity to declare secret knowledge publically (that the buildings were going to collapse?) Giuliani is many things, but not stupid.
kingdead
It would be very easy for a plane to be hijacked by men with box cutters, simply because before 9/11, it was assumed that a hijacking was like a kidnapping in the air - the hijackers would fly the plane to a certain destination, then negotiate on the ground. Passengers and crew were supposed to remain quiet, as trying to overcome the hijackers would exacerbate the situation and lower the chances of survival. There's also some evidence that the hijackers didn't just have box cutters, but also something that resembled a bomb - probably a fake, but nobody's going to get up close and personal to a hijacker to check it out.

Now, of course, things are different.
Flahdagal
QUOTE (mambru+Mar 12 2007, 11:18 AM)

I regard that 9/11 attack the same way...they took advantage of careless gaps in a system and scored a coup. The Twin Towers were not solid steel buildings but a cage framework of steel and glass. The planes were also metal, and full of fuel. They were like Molotov cocktail, except made of metal and going several hundred miles an hour.
I concur. Also, and lots of folks figured it out before the media did, they deliberately chose coast-to-coast non-stop flights that have the largest payload of fuel, while they still had the majority of fuel in the tanks.

Coast-to-coast?? Ohmygod! ART BELL was a co-conspirator!!
StellaStarr
Are any of you guys referring to "Loose Change" on Google video?

Loose Change
IRule
I'm with Flahdagal and Mambru -- the gaps and lapses in the system certainly aided the terrorists in successfully pulling off 9/11, but I do not believe that it was some huge widespread government conspiracy or any of the other bogus science about how a building is "supposed" to fall and how fire is "supposed" to act in that circumstance.

Food for thought - my sister was at Logan airport on September 10 -- she actually flew out around 10 PM (some part on their plane fell off or something and was delayed for several hours - she would have been on a flight to LA Tuesday morning - probably Flight 11 or Flight 175 - but her boyfriend needed to be home for a business meeting the morning of the 11th), after being stuck in the airport almost all day -- she said security was really, really lax - she and her then-boyfriend even commented on it to one another - they weren't asked to show their IDs or whatever when going from terminal to terminal (I think they might have tried to get on other flights and ended up going back and forth through security a few times at Logan as a result). Now, conspirators would take this as a sign that the people at the airport were just gearing up to ignore checking stuff out -- but I personally think that behavior is just an example of how lax the standards at Logan were on their own - without any evil plan going on behind the scenes. The people working at the airport were poorly trained and either didn't care or weren't in the habbit of following FAA safety regulations regarding security and whatnot. I mean, I remember back in '99 - one of my classmates snuck pot through LAX en route to an academic event out of state. He had a dime in his jacket pocket and walked straight through security/x-ray whatever. Even then I thought that was kind of screwed up (I was one of my Mock Trial teammates wasn't busted en route to a Mock Trial thingie in D.C. - but I still thought it was messed up) - because like, I can see getting drugs through some tiny airport in Nebraska or something - but LAX? Come on. Granted, the systems in place for security had flaws anyway - but I think a lot of the public underestimated (or didn't even consider) how poorly those guidelines/regulations were even followed.
whome
I knew Wal-Mart was tagging/chipping crates and then a few individual items, but I never shop there and so I wasn't worried. I did not know individual items at other stores were being chipped. I don't do much clothes shopping--and the last thing I bought at Old Navy was a tagless T-shirt (ha!), so no chip hidden there. I doubt I have anything that's been chipped, but is there a list somewhere of stores/items that carry chips?

I am concerned about the chips in passports. It seems like an identity thief could have a grand ol' time scanning people's passports. Sure, they're supposedly scannable only from a few inches and only when the passport's open, but I don't buy it. I plan on joining the tin foil group and wrapping my passport in tin foil. I may make some crafty, pretty case for it so I don't get weird looks from agents when I get my passport out.
kingdead
Are we talking about the chips that make you into an incredible beeping machine if you shoplift/your cashier forgets to disable them? Or is this something more sophisticated?
Mike-El
QUOTE (IRule+Mar 12 2007, 04:10 PM)
I'm with Flahdagal and Mambru -- the gaps and lapses in the system certainly aided the terrorists in successfully pulling off 9/11, but I do not believe that it was some huge widespread government conspiracy or any of the other bogus science about how a building is "supposed" to fall and how fire is "supposed" to act in that circumstance.


I think that when you look at the perpetrators of 9/11 and the relative crudeness of their operation, there's kind of an "Ewoks beating the Imperial Army" senselessness to it that makes people look deeper in search of explanations. This was the kind of act we associate with Die Hard-looking Eurotrash wielding high-tech weapons. I don't know that we can quite wrap our heads around the idea of a bunch of swarthy guys with box cutters pulling it off.
IRule
Mike - yeah, I understand that - it's the same reason the Kennedy assassination theories of the second gunmen have continued to prevail, even though it has been pretty much conclusively proven that Oswald was the lone shooter. I used to be real big on the Kennedy theories too - but after that 2004 3-D rendering of the Zapruder film that showed that the angle of the bullets, when aligned with how the seats in the convertible were lined up had a direct line to the window in the Book Depository - I had stop even pretending to believe anything other than some crazy ex-Marine dude named Lee Harvey Oswald managed to take out the leader of the free world with three shots. You don't want to believe that sort of thing can happen - that our leaders, our country and our iconic structures are all so fallible, you know?
Kitty Foyle
QUOTE
Well, but the part about the hijackers with boxcutters really did happen...unless you want to bring the pilots and the passengers with their cell-phone accounts into the conspiracy too. And the fact that they COULD take over the planes with such simple tactics shows how easily a flaw in a complex, shoddy security system can be exploited with a little originality.
Certainly the hijackers were real. I never said that they weren't. And the victims (including the crews) on the planes are indeed dead. As for cell phones, I've never been certain how they worked so well at such speed and altitude, but apparently they did.

I disagree about the construction of the twin towers. They had a solid steel core, which was somehow nearly completely obliterated that day. They were built to withstand the largest airliner of the day, one of approximately the same size that did hit them. It is my understanding that the fuel burned quickly, and never reached a temperature high enough to melt steel. We can never know for certain how the towers collapsed, because even though it was a crime scene, the remaining steel was quickly sent overseas to be melted down.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
Well, but the part about the hijackers with boxcutters really did happen...unless you want to bring the pilots and the passengers with their cell-phone accounts into the conspiracy too. And the fact that they COULD take over the planes with such simple tactics shows how easily a flaw in a complex, shoddy security system can be exploited with a little originality.
Certainly the hijackers were real. I never said that they weren't. And the victims (including the crews) on the planes are indeed dead. As for cell phones, I've never been certain how they worked so well at such speed and altitude, but apparently they did.

I disagree about the construction of the twin towers. They had a solid steel core, which was somehow nearly completely obliterated that day. They were built to withstand the largest airliner of the day, one of approximately the same size that did hit them. It is my understanding that the fuel burned quickly, and never reached a temperature high enough to melt steel. We can never know for certain how the towers collapsed, because even though it was a crime scene, the remaining steel was quickly sent overseas to be melted down.

So now Rudy's in on it too? Now, I totally dislike Giuliani as a mean-spirited toad of a man (as a New Yorker who actually lived there when America's Mayor was New York's pain in the ass). But I have some trouble believing he'd meekly go along with this simply in order to get some good photo ops for his presidential campaign - or that the conspirators would want to enlist him (and I suppose, all the forces he controlled, or else what would be the point) if he did. The more people in on it, the more chance of exposure. And if he were in on it, wouldn't it be the epitome of stupidity to declare secret knowledge publically (that the buildings were going to collapse?) Giuliani is many things, but not stupid.
I don't know if Rudy is in on "it," whatever "it" is. I don't even know enough about him to know that he's mean-spirited. However, he did say that the towers would fall before they did. I heard it with my own ears. And he did not hole up in Building 7, although that was his chosen command center for just such an occurence. I don't claim to have the answers. However, I do have a lot of questions and they have not been adequately answered for me by TPTB.

QUOTE
Looking back on it 5 years later, if there really was a conspiracy, those were some super-dumb conspirators. Way to work in your own best interests, Saudi Royal Family/Elders of Zion/Halliburton*!
I'm puzzled by this comment, kingdead. It sounds as if you mean it sarcastically. But the Saudis and Haliburton seem to me to be doing quite well financially. Not sure what you mean by "Elders of Zion."

Are people here offended that I don't accept the official story 100%? I'm not offended at your beliefs. But I am somewhat offended to be mocked for questioning what we've been told. I am highly suspicious that our leaders lied us into what I consider an unjust, immoral war based on these attacks, and only admitted there was no connection when they had no other choice. And Cheney still tries to make a connection, completely unrelated to facts.

I was as horrified as any other American that day. I love my country as much as any other American. I'd fight to the death for your right to disagree with me. I believe in freedom and democracy. I have a right to my opinions.



EarthMomma
derryfree, you had me at hello, baby. I flove you.

Rudy is totally in on "it". He sold out his city so he could be the next Republican in the White House.

Elders of Zion = hoaxy Jewish plot to control the world = antisemitism.

Not to be confused with the Bilderberg Group.
EarthMomma
QUOTE (Flahdagal+Mar 12 2007, 11:26 AM)
Coast-to-coast?? Ohmygod! ART BELL was a co-conspirator!!
I wouldn't be surprised.
EarthMomma
QUOTE (IRule+Mar 12 2007, 04:48 PM)
Mike - yeah, I understand that - it's the same reason the Kennedy assassination theories of the second gunmen have continued to prevail, even though it has been pretty much conclusively proven that Oswald was the lone shooter. I used to be real big on the Kennedy theories too - but after that 2004 3-D rendering of the Zapruder film that showed that the angle of the bullets, when aligned with how the seats in the convertible were lined up had a direct line to the window in the Book Depository - I had stop even pretending to believe anything other than some crazy ex-Marine dude named Lee Harvey Oswald managed to take out the leader of the free world with three shots. You don't want to believe that sort of thing can happen - that our leaders, our country and our iconic structures are all so fallible, you know?
Of course there was only one gunman, Oswald. Who ordered the hit though? And who ordered Jack Ruby? What about Ruby's oh so convienent pulmonary embolism? CIA? Mafia? Cubans? Roscoe White? Soviets? Reptilians?
mambru
QUOTE
I disagree about the construction of the twin towers. They had a solid steel core, which was somehow nearly completely obliterated that day. They were built to withstand the largest airliner of the day, one of approximately the same size that did hit them.
Could you direct me to the source of that? Definitely not what I heard at the time. Was it standard to calculate how big a plane collision a building could take before 9/11?

I really don't have a huge problem with the planes causing the towers to collapse. It's true that the planes were made of aluminum, while the Towers' framework was made of steel, but that doesn't take into account the force velocity can impart. Flesh and bone are soft, but we've all seen a black belt break a brick with his hand. Lead is soft, but if you took a steel birdcage and shot a hollow-point lead slug through it, you'd do considerable damage, maybe even enough to collapse it, though I can't be sure of that. However, you can't put little jet engines on the bullet (so that it would be accelerating as the planes were instead of decelerating as a bullet would) or load the bullets with a tank of jet fuel (to provide the medium for a subsequent fire exactly at the site of damage) so it's more difficult to simulate that part. I agree that the fire by itself wouldn't have caused the collapse, but coupled with the considerable structural damage the crash would have caused, I can believe that what was left of the supporting frame might have been too weakened to hold up for long.

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
I disagree about the construction of the twin towers. They had a solid steel core, which was somehow nearly completely obliterated that day. They were built to withstand the largest airliner of the day, one of approximately the same size that did hit them.
Could you direct me to the source of that? Definitely not what I heard at the time. Was it standard to calculate how big a plane collision a building could take before 9/11?

I really don't have a huge problem with the planes causing the towers to collapse. It's true that the planes were made of aluminum, while the Towers' framework was made of steel, but that doesn't take into account the force velocity can impart. Flesh and bone are soft, but we've all seen a black belt break a brick with his hand. Lead is soft, but if you took a steel birdcage and shot a hollow-point lead slug through it, you'd do considerable damage, maybe even enough to collapse it, though I can't be sure of that. However, you can't put little jet engines on the bullet (so that it would be accelerating as the planes were instead of decelerating as a bullet would) or load the bullets with a tank of jet fuel (to provide the medium for a subsequent fire exactly at the site of damage) so it's more difficult to simulate that part. I agree that the fire by itself wouldn't have caused the collapse, but coupled with the considerable structural damage the crash would have caused, I can believe that what was left of the supporting frame might have been too weakened to hold up for long.

However, he did say that the towers would fall before they did. I heard it with my own ears.
<br>I don't doubt it. But because of what I already stated above, I think that any expert who surveyed the buildings right after the crash might see that the extensive damage sustained did put them in danger of collapse. Maybe Giuliani came to this conclusion on his own, or more likely a specialist surveyed the damage and told him.

QUOTE
Not sure what you mean by "Elders of Zion."

<br>I think what's referred to is the widespread theory in the Arabic world that 9/11 was caused by Zionist Jews who wanted an excuse to attack the Arab world. The proof? Not ONE Jew died in 9/11. Sounds utterly convincing, doesn't it? Except it's wrong. One glance at the actual casualty list will turn up plenty of Jewish names. But there's many Arabic websites and news media that have the no-Jewish-casualties theory as gospel truth. It's a meme that will never be overtaken now in the Middle East.

I'm not intending to mock your belief, derryfree. I do think that this government took advantage of the situation to start an entirely unnecessary war in which their Halliburton pals profited obscenely. I just don't feel the evidence justifies so complex a conspiracy theory.
Flahdagal
QUOTE (derryfree+Mar 12 2007, 05:56 PM)

Are people here offended that I don't accept the official story 100%?  I'm not offended at your beliefs.  But I am somewhat offended to be mocked for questioning what we've been told.  I am highly suspicious that our leaders lied us into what I consider an unjust, immoral war based on these attacks, and only admitted there was no connection when they had no other choice.  And Cheney still tries to make a connection, completely unrelated to facts. 

I was as horrified as any other American that day.  I love my country as much as any other American.  I'd fight to the death for your right to disagree with me.  I believe in freedom and democracy.  I have a right to my opinions.

Yes, I'm totally and completely offended that you don't agree with me 100%, because I am right, right, right!

Personally, I love hearing new tidbits, new ideas, new viewpoints. I don't believe for a second that the official report is lily white. I believe our government is capable of a lot of nasty things, and will wrap each and every one of those nasty things in our sacred flag and tell me horseshit is buttercups.

QUOTE ("IRule"+)
I had stop even pretending to believe anything other than some crazy ex-Marine dude named Lee Harvey Oswald managed to take out the leader of the free world with three shots.

<br>user posted image

Gunnery Sergeant Hartman: Do any of you people know where these individuals learned how to shoot?... Private Joker.
Private Joker: Sir. In the Marines, Sir.
Gunnery Sergeant Hartman: In the Marines. Outstanding. Those individuals showed what one motivated Marine and his rifle can do. And before you ladies leave my Island, you will all be able to do the same thing.
EarthMomma
QUOTE (mambru+Mar 12 2007, 05:22 PM)
QUOTE
However, he did say that the towers would fall before they did. I heard it with my own ears.
<br>I don't doubt it. But because of what I already stated above, I think that any expert who surveyed the buildings right after the crash might see that the extensive damage sustained did put them in danger of collapse. Maybe Giuliani came to this conclusion on his own, or more likely a specialist surveyed the damage and told him. What about WTC-7? I could easily buy the story about Towers 1 & 2 coming down, but not WTC-7.
whome
QUOTE (kingdead+Mar 12 2007, 02:33 PM)
Are we talking about the chips that make you into an incredible beeping machine if you shoplift/your cashier forgets to disable them? Or is this something more sophisticated?
I hadn't heard of it until EarthMomma mentioned it in the health thread last week. After doing a little googling just now, I'm still not sure whether they are in fact RFIDs. They may just be electronic article surveillance (EAS) tags. I don't know enough about it. But even if it's not happening much yet, it will happen. See this and the link within.
EarthMomma
QUOTE (whome+Mar 12 2007, 06:14 PM)
QUOTE (kingdead+Mar 12 2007, 02:33 PM)
Are we talking about the chips that make you into an incredible beeping machine if you shoplift/your cashier forgets to disable them? Or is this something more sophisticated?

I hadn't heard of it until EarthMomma mentioned it in the health thread last week. After doing a little googling just now, I'm still not sure whether they are in fact RFIDs. They may just be electronic article surveillance (EAS) tags. I don't know enough about it. But even if it's not happening much yet, it will happen. See this and the link within.

And then check this out.

And speaking of Giuliani....
Hot off the presses:
Firefighters Urge "Peeling Of Giuliani's 9/11 Onion" - Spokesman for largest Firefighters' union speaks out
skittlebrau
QUOTE (Mike El+)
I think that when you look at the perpetrators of 9/11 and the relative crudeness of their operation, there's kind of an "Ewoks beating the Imperial Army" senselessness to it that makes people look deeper in search of explanations.

<br>
QUOTE (Dane+)

QUOTE ((EarthMomma @ Mar 11 2007+ 11:01 PM))

Either the Gov. had a hand in it all along, or they allowed it to happen.


Granted, I've never been a member of the armed forces, but this seems like a huge leap of logic.

<br>"Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, Chef's attorney would certainly want you to believe that his client wrote "Stinky Britches" ten years ago. And they make a good case. Hell, I almost felt pity myself! But, ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a wookie from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about that; that does not make sense! Why would a wookie, an 8 foot tall wookie, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of two foot tall ewoks? That does not make sense! But more importantly, you have to ask yourself, ‘what does that have to do with this case?' Nothing. Ladies and Gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case. It does not make sense! Look at me. I'm a lawyer defending a major record company, and I'm talkin' about Chewbacca! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit! The defense rests."
EarthMomma
The Chewy Defense?
skittlebrau
Yes. If Chewbacca lives on Endor, then there is no spoon.
EarthMomma
The terrorist have won.
mambru
QUOTE
I disagree about the construction of the twin towers. They had a solid steel core, which was somehow nearly completely obliterated that day.
<br>Found this and this. The core of the towers wasn't solid steel. It had elevator shafts and stairs running through it, so it was hollow. The main support of the building was the steel exterior skeleton - which took the brunt of the damage.

Also:

QUOTE (->
QUOTE
I disagree about the construction of the twin towers. They had a solid steel core, which was somehow nearly completely obliterated that day.
<br>Found this and this. The core of the towers wasn't solid steel. It had elevator shafts and stairs running through it, so it was hollow. The main support of the building was the steel exterior skeleton - which took the brunt of the damage.

Also:

Leslie Robertson, the engineer largely responsible for the structure of the Twin Towers, has admitted that although a plane crash was considered when designing the building, aviation fuel explosion and fire were not.
<br>So you were right about them having originally calculated the impact of a plane crash. But the designer himself admits that fuel explosion and fire was not calculated as co-occurring with the crash, and he's not screaming "explosives!" as an excuse, though of all people he'd be the one with the most incentive to blame someone else, and the knowledge of whether such a thing were necessary for collapse or not.

And EarthMomma, I don't know much about the WTC-7 collapse (I argued a lot with my dad about the Twin Towers so I know more about them). But to me, the notion that Enron engineered the collapse of the Twin Towers as a distraction so that they could destroy ANOTHER building to get rid of records inside (in the age of a thousand interlinked computers and hard copies and electronic copies everywhere) just is...beyond bizarre to me.
kingdead
I think somebody has a racist attitude towards Wookies...

QUOTE
I think what's referred to is the widespread theory in the Arabic world that 9/11 was caused by Zionist Jews who wanted an excuse to attack the Arab world. The proof? Not ONE Jew died in 9/11. Sounds utterly convincing, doesn't it?
<br>Partially to that, and partially to the "AIPAC conspiracy" theories you can pick up by hanging around left-wing boards for a while. AIPAC and the Jewish-dominated neoconservatives control the President and used him as a tool to attack Iraq in Israel's interests. This, of course, links up to the "Jews caused 9/11" theory, but it's in opposition to the "Bush and Saudis did it together!" theory.

I know of this because my brother's ex-girlfriend was a grad student in foreign policy, and she brought a "Foreign Policy" magazine on a family vacation. It happened to have an article about AIPAC in it, and my parents were convinced that her family had links to Nazis after seeing the cover...
skittlebrau
QUOTE
I think somebody has a racist attitude towards Wookies.
<br>You're close. I hate Ewoks. Goddamn furry little cannibals.

And until someone can convince me otherwise, I am confident that Mr. Muggles is responsible for all evolutionary mutantism. He's a highly evolved super poodle... thing. Like a tiny Ewok, he plots your doom.
Kitty Foyle
Here's a site with differing facts from some other sites. There's something for everyone on the internets. And it's all facts. So they all say. Following the money makes me quite comfortable with my beliefs. YMMV.
mambru
I'm happy you're comfry, derrfree. Forgive my whimsicality - my Ambien'sa kicking in smile.gif
I'm aware there's lots of versions around. Mine has the testimony of the designer that I appended, and yours doesn't, but of course, this isn't conclusive.
But it shouldn't be too problematic to verify that, for example, the WTC core was hollow and had stairs and elevator shafts running through it. The plans must be a matter of public record. I mean, it's a verifiable fact, and most of the elevators and stairs in the core WERE knocked out at the level of the fire, which was why most of the people at the top COULDN'T get down in time. Even the site you linked admits "The core structures housed the elevators, stairs, and other services."
here:http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/core.html
So, not solid, not invulnerable.
Following the money can lead us to the very best answers - Halliburton certainly profited a lot out of the subsequent events, the scumbags. And Dubya got the marvelous chance to symbolically resolve his Oedipus complex in getting Saddam like Poppy couldn't do. (Though looking at Barbara I wonder how intense his complex could've been, anyway). The excuse to drum up dubious reasons for an Iraqi invasion was a godsend. Doesn't mean he engineered 9/11 to invade Iraq, though; if he had wouldn't he have just put at least one Iraqi onboard, just for versimilitude? I'm maundering. Good night. Stay comfy, derry.
EarthMomma
Whenever I read the title of this thread, I hum to myself, "I always feel like somebody's watching meeeeeeeeee."

The Rockefeller Foundation is calling for a mass world-wide HPV immunization campaign. What a joke.
QUOTE
"The world cannot afford to wait 20 years to begin saving women from cervical cancer."
No Merck and the New World Order can't wait. Instead of spending $$$$ on this b.s. campaign, how about doing something about AIDS in Africa or running water!!!
EssPee
QUOTE (EarthMomma+)
The Rockefeller Foundation is calling for a mass world-wide HPV immunization campaign. What a joke.

Since the HPV vaccines do work, and since the expected approval of Glaxo's vaccine is likely to bring prices down, and since 80% of cervical-cancer deaths occur in the developing world where Pap smears and other screening is often non-existent, and since the International Planned Parenthood Federation rep said that vaccines typically take 20-25 years to move from the developed to the developing world, I don't see why this is a priori such a stupid idea.

Preventing cervical-cancer deaths certainly seems like a worthy cause, and vaccines have proven themselves time and again to be the cheapest and most effective way to defeat infectious disease. For instance, EarthMomma, if you have a better idea for ending the AIDS pandemic than a safe and even partially effective vaccine against HIV (assuming such a thing is possible, which is still unknown), I'm sure the world is dying -- literally -- to hear about it.
Dane
QUOTE (EssPee+Mar 14 2007, 12:50 AM)
Since the HPV vaccines do work,
And when I think of the heartache it would have saved me, wouldn't it have been a luxury to have had access to it when I was in college?

Call me crazy, but I believe vaccines are a wonderful thing. They're not perfect, but nothing is.
kingdead
QUOTE
Since the HPV vaccines do work, and since the expected approval of Glaxo's vaccine is likely to bring prices down, and since 80% of cervical-cancer deaths occur in the developing world where Pap smears and other screening is often non-existent
<br>I hadn't even thought about that - the fact that there are many places in the world where the standard of gynecological care is poor, to say the least. The same places where cancer treatment would be very hard to get.

The New Yorker just ran an interesting article on AIDS denialists in South Africa. South Africa is one of the few African countries with enough money to start up an antiviral drug program, but the government has chosen to concentrate on vitamin treatment instead. AIDS denialists get me so angry, especially because so many of them seem to think that AIDS is some sort of moral judgement (the act of gay sex somehow gives you AIDS, etc.)
EssPee
On WTC 7, which came up here a little while ago, it's worth noting that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, the former National Bureau of Standards -- yeah, the atomic-clock people) is still conducting a detailed analysis of what caused its collapse. (Apparently all their people got pulled off WTC 7 in June 2004 to focus full-time on the collapse of the towers themselves. In October 2005 they re-initiated the WTC 7 investigation.)

This December 2006 status report (PDF) provides a fairly detailed look at their approach. Intriguingly enough, the NIST investigators are in fact analyzing "hypothetical blast events" (page 11) such as controlled demolition. So it looks like they'll at least give the conspiracy theories a fair shake, not that I expect the draft report -- due sometime this spring, supposedly -- to convince anyone whose mind is made up on the subject.
EarthMomma
Prominent 9/11 Truth Debunker Admits Smear Tactics
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march...meartactics.htm
EssPee
The most shocking thing about that story was learning that the 9/11 conspiracy theorists call themselves "truthers." I'd be surprised if they could find the truth with both hands and a tub of vaseline.

Although it all starts to makes sense if the 9/11 conspiracy movement is, in fact, actually run by the government. Because, you know, one-fourth of the population is retarded.

Edited to include a better video link.
EarthMomma
Only 1/4th?
EarthMomma
Rosie O'Donnell - Good for the 9/11 Truth movement or bad? Discuss.
Alice
QUOTE (EarthMomma+Apr 7 2007, 12:38 PM)
Rosie O'Donnell - Good for the 9/11 Truth movement or bad? Discuss.
Bad.

I think that no matter what you believe on the alleged conspiracy (or any other subject) you have to evaluate all sides of the argument and consider all sources.

If I believe there might be some sort of thread of truth to the "truth movement", that doesn't mean I should blindly believe every aspect of what they are alleging. Someone like Rosie, who I'm sure means well, shouldn't be stepping forward in such a public forum and just reciting the same things she's read or heard without fully investigating the allegations and sources.

I just think she's so over the top when she buys in to something that she comes off like a loon and it doesn't do any favors to the side she's speaking on behalf of. If her kooky behavior is seen as the role model for the movement, they are going to be thought of as kooky (kookier) as well.
EarthMomma
ND was the second state to ban forced human RFID chips today. Hooray!!!
BluesLover
I'll second that. The thought that anyone would willingly agree to be implanted with a RFID device is truly beyond my grasp. (And as long as I remain unimplanted I am beyond anyone else's grasp, hah!)
neverenoughjam
No need for legislation so long as the supply of tinfoil for hats doesn't run out.
fernbeau
Speaking of Big Brother, now, apparently, he/she can scold/shame you verbally as well:

Hey! You! Yes, you!

I think I should be outraged, but instead I think it's kind of amusing, in a Who said that? kind of way.
another_iteration
Why worry about RFID chips when everyone is carrying around GPS capable cell phones and lawd only knows what all this new GPS and mapping technology in cars means. Sure it looks like a *luxury* but...

I am sincerely happy that Rosie has backed off the 9/11 thing, more for her than anything. She has gotten way too much flak about it - also I think it takes away from her larger goal of getting us the hell out of Iraq. YMMV.
BluesLover
QUOTE
Why worry about RFID chips when everyone is carrying around GPS capable cell phones and lawd only knows what all this new GPS and mapping technology in cars means.
<br>Re the phone thing: Yesterday, I was listening to the radio & the talk was about the VTech shootings & if the students could have been 'mass' alerted in some way (which, of course, has been debated since the shootings happened). The subject of emergency cell phone trees came up: does the technology exist, should something be addressed at a state vs federal level, how would the various cell companies merge emergency coverage & so on. Can't wait to see what privacy advocates will say about the feds having global access to cell phones. . .
Magpie
Sounds like the Amber Alert system, which has been in place for a couple of years now. I think all the major cell phone providers participate, so the capability for transmitting other emergency info is there. The catch is that the alerts are transmitted by text messaging, and not everyone has that capability on their phones. I guess the second catch would be how to alert people who have their phone turned off when they are in classrooms, meetings, etc.
neverenoughjam
How about if we just go back to that old standy, an alarm system? A honkin' loud alarm like a fire alarm or whatever would alert anyone within hearing that there was a problem. Then we don't have to assume that everyone has a cellphone or has it turned on.
kingdead
Where would you go, though? If there's somebody on the loose with a gun, a random warning isn't going to help - you're just going to panic people and may inadvertently send some of them straight into the shooter's path.
p2c2e
But that is the same argument with a phone tree, what is to stop the police from calling whoever is currently committing the crime, or cause a panic somewhere else because some of the people cell phones were not on campus, anywhere near campus, or hell on another college campus entirely.

The problem is that the answer to this question is that there is never going to be an appropriate response.

The attacks were hours apart and completely different, even if everyone had gotten the message that their had been a shooting on campus I really doubt it would have stopped a vast majority of people from attending their classes, it was two people in a dorm attack and the police were questioning a suspect, 9 times out of 10 it would not be cause for a campus wide response at a school of this size. The problem with attacks like these is that no matter the precautions, it's likely that the same thing would happen if they could do it over.
BluesLover
QUOTE
...there is never going to be an appropriate response.
<br>Hmm, excellent point, p2c2e. My original post above was in reference to the idea of the Feds having automatic access to us via cell phone numbers (which I imagine they can probably obtain fairly easily altho, in theory anyway, I would think a subpoena would be necessary.)

But there's this: people are going to demand that some kind of warning system be implemented (in schools, malls, huge amusement parks) thinking it would prevent the VTech-brand of madness. neverenoughjam's idea of an alarm or overhead squawk system seems logical -- except for the people who, hearing the alarm, don't take cover but wander into the open, saying, 'what's going on -- where's my video camera?'

I fear any type of global early warning thing will ultimately be via cell phones. I just hate the idea.
little melly
They could have a campus wide PA system, just like they did in high school; that way, you could hear a voice and instructions. But I agree, there's never going to be anything that will be fool proof.
neverenoughjam
QUOTE (BluesLover+Apr 23 2007, 09:58 PM)
QUOTE
...there is never going to be an appropriate response.
<br>Hmm, excellent point, p2c2e. My original post above was in reference to the idea of the Feds having automatic access to us via cell phone numbers (which I imagine they can probably obtain fairly easily altho, in theory anyway, I would think a subpoena would be necessary.)

But there's this: people are going to demand that some kind of warning system be implemented (in schools, malls, huge amusement parks) thinking it would prevent the VTech-brand of madness. neverenoughjam's idea of an alarm or overhead squawk system seems logical -- except for the people who, hearing the alarm, don't take cover but wander into the open, saying, 'what's going on -- where's my video camera?'

I fear any type of global early warning thing will ultimately be via cell phones. I just hate the idea. Re: people wandering around with cell phone cameras hoping to make the news

Yeah, there will always be idiots. Can't do a thing about 'em. Nor would I waste time trying to prevent such foolishness. What I'd do is have an alarm system loud enough to get people's attention, and perhaps with different tones/patterns. For example, fire alarms and air raid sirens are pitched differently. I can see the Feds setting up standard alarm patterns for fire, hurricane, air raid, crazed-gunman, or whatever alerts are necessary. It's not fool-proof--nothing is--but it's better than letting hundreds of students walk back onto campus and possibly into the line of fire. The next crazed gunman may not be in a classroom--he may be doing a Charlie Whitman, up in some high tower or building. A warning to take shelter in that case would save lives.

Again, not perfect, but better than relying on other people to own cell phones that are a) charged, cool.gif turned on and c) actually on their persons.
dzdzsty
I guess my problem with the kerfuffle over the lack of a lockdown is that the killer was a Tech student - he could have just gone rampaging through his own dorm if the campus was in lockdown, which would have been just as horrible.
BluesLover
QUOTE
What I'd do is have an alarm system loud enough to get people's attention, and perhaps with different tones/patterns. For example, fire alarms and air raid sirens are pitched differently. I can see the Feds setting up standard alarm patterns for fire, hurricane, air raid, crazed-gunman, or whatever alerts are necessary. It's not fool-proof--nothing is--but it's better than letting hundreds of students walk back onto campus and possibly into the line of fire.
<br>I think your idea is far superior to the cell phone thing, neverenoughjam & sadly, will probably be needed someday. (And I love your screen name, being someone for whom neverenoughsaucedressingorgravy is heaven!)
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.
dizayn.de © 2003 - 2009 - "lo-fi" for InvisionPower Board v1.3